The communication balance – what is too little and what is too much?

Sometimes there is a thin line between communicating two little and two much. Below, I will share to common situations online where this is particularly evident; with opt-in/confirmations and with newsletter lists.

 Opt-ins and confirmations

Nowadays we are used to getting some kind of confirmation when we sign up for a service, a newsletter or what it might be. An opt-in och something else.  we don’t get this confirmation, regardless of what it is for, many of us begins to question if we did it all right. Did I really order that service or not?

On the other hand, if there are to many steps, email we might refer to them as this time, we get annoyed. We feel “spammed.” For example, if you opt-ed in for a service and then receives a thank you email with no more useful information than that. This might be received a spam instead of the second confirmation that it was intended as. For some services it might be necessary to have a double opt-in, or some other type of double confirmation.

The suggestion here, seems to be, what ever confirmation/opt-in that brings some kind of value for the receiver is granted. Could be more security or a easier adaptation to the service.

Newsletter lists

From experience I rarely sign up for newsletters before I now what I will receive. For example a company who says “product info, new etc” but not gives any indication on how many times they send them, I would never accept. Mostly, because many companies seem to have problems with the “unsubscribe” button. The same goes for companies who offer a whole list of newsletters that they have for different subjects.

However, a few weeks ago, I tired one of those lists and signed up for a few newsletters that I found interesting. BIG MISTAKE! It turned out that each of the newsletters is delivered once or more per day, which was never said in the list. Which means that I now barley even check the box that they comes to, because I want to start reading but it is too overwhelming.

Conclusions

Ask your subscribers what they think works and don’t work with your communication. This way they will feel more included, and you limit the changes for you to be viewed as a spammer or that they feel like you fooled them. Be honest and share! But not to much ;)

Does anyone cares about iPhone apps rating?

Before I download and app, regardless if it is free or paid I always check the rating. How many starts the apps has got. If it is a popular apps with low rating I usually also check the comments. Therefore I’m very surprised when apps with only a start or two, with almost entirely negative comments reach up on the top list.

Is it because I’m the only one who readers other comments, or could it be that people want to try for themselves. Or could it be that apple has not succeeded in optimizing this function?

Though it might like the idea of standing out, I think my first reason I rather unlikely. The second I don’t believe in that much either, since people in general are rather lazy, and usually believe in what everyone else says. If I would tell someone that the hamburger place on the corner sucks I doubt that many would go. If 10 other people said the same thing as me, I believe that number would be even lower.

The only option left (in my mind) is that apples system on rating is not user friendly enough. People might see the star rating but feel that the comments are two difficult to find, or might not even know where they are. Therefore they try the apps themselves instead of listening to others. “The app might be good for me, as I don’t know why others don’t like it”.

Another reason could be that most people only rate apps when they throw them away, meaning that apps which people don’t want to keep are more likely to be reviewed than those that people are currently using.

What do you think? Do you care about the iPhone apps rating?

How To: Create an event which has it all > in one day > #SMMUK10

I cannot describe in words how thankful I’m for the opportunity to attend #SMMUK10 in London and most of all taking the opportunity. I flew here from Sweden last night and is going back again tonight.

One day:

15 presentations & 22 presenters/discussions all on social media marketing = #SMMUK10

Now, I have to admit that these many opinions and lecture might be seen as information overload and to many opinions, but it hasn’t been! Instead the even organizers have managed to wrap it all up.

We have heard/seen

  • examples
  • ideas
  • case studies
  • strategies
  • what to do/what not to do
  • crash courses

And best of all, since many of the presenters have listened to each other all day they actually have mentioned each other when they have brought up similar subjects, which have given the listeners a great perspective!

How To: Create an event which has it all > in one day > #SMMUK10

I cannot describe in words how thankful I’m for the opportunity to attend #SMMUK10 in London and most of all taking the opportunity. I flew here from Sweden last night and is going back again tonight.

One day:

15 presentations & 22 presenters/discussions all on social media marketing = #SMMUK10

Now, I have to admit that these many opinions and lecture might be seen as information overload and to many opinions, but it hasn’t been! Instead the even organizers have managed to wrap it all up.

We have heard/seen

  • examples
  • ideas
  • case studies
  • strategies
  • what to do/what not to do
  • crash courses

And best of all, since many of the presenters have listened to each other all day they actually have mentioned each other when they have brought up similar subjects, which have given the listeners a great perspective!

iPhone blog – #smmuk10 changing perspective – people are the channels

I’m going to give you à few summaries of the event later. But until then i’m going to develop à few ideas and concepts which have either been new for me or have been presented from, for me, knew angel.

Enough said, to the point.

the @mediaczar aka Matt Morrisson spoke about People as channels.

Which made me ser à few things differently. Upon til now I’ve seen twitter as à channel. À communication channel, information channel, marketing channel, you name it.

But what happens if I move that to seeing the people on the networks as à channel. If in speaking with People irl i dont need à channel, so why do i need it online? I don’t need à channel for interactive communication online, i need à tool!

Broadcasting need channels but interaction need tools. If i stop seeing twitter as à tool like à cellphone, Will i get closer to the People im talking with?

Or has infact My thoughts been this and My actions different?

What do you think? What are your take on this?

Social media marketing uk 2010 – #SMMUK10 – the first four presenters

We have been listening to five presenters so far and right now we have two more on stage. Here is a short summary of what we have heard so far!

It is impressive how many ideas and thoughts about social media which can be presented in one day and how many people who are working with it. This event is for me a proof that social & digital media is no longer something you can do, it is an industry that you can work in.

First of all key points from all the speakers so far:

Brian Solis – @briansolis – #nicheworks #contextual-networks #interest-graph
Richard Sedley – @richardsedley  - #social-objects #social-proof #reciprocity #storytelling
Mat Morrison – @mediaczar –  “Viral? No. Just “Amplified”. #everyone is contextual
Matt Rhodes & Naomi Paget – viral success & ongoing engagement

A few interesting Tweets from the morning

MatrixLtd: Social media isn’t just a channel, it’s a source of information…(@mediaczar#smmuk10

iSOFT_Shaun: RT @seanEclark: Start collecting social data now – invaluable!@mediaczar #SMMUK10

annelienaes: RT @Synthesio: Authority does not equal influence, but the # of connections you have can make you influential #smmuk10 US ex from@mediaczar

TXLotusLive: ONLINE COMMUNITY: build own niche around your biz. Keep community vibrant. Communicate story widely - @briansolis #smmuk10

jododds: RT @grahamjones: We have to leave behind concept of marketng as broadcasting says @briansolis at #smmuk10 [inbound marketing rules!]




The gowalla vs foursquare battle in Sweden

We have heard about the networking games for a while, most of us have tried them as well. Now the big challenge in Sweden begin, without anyone knowing the stats of either.

foursqaure (first add i’ve seen)

Gowalla (first swedish trip by a GO)

Let the battle begin!

Are we valuing quantitive quality over experience?

Usually experience tends to count for a lot, but when it comes to blogging Ihave come to realize that it does not matter as much. Think about it, you follow a blog because of quantity, assuming of course that it is quality content.  This feels like common knowledge when it comes to finding great blog and following them consistently, but in what other part of the society is this the case?

However, is the society changing to become more like the blogosphere?  Are we valuing quantitive quality over experience?

Think about it.

The first argument against this might be that quantitive quality is the same thing as experience. But if you take the blogosphere example it is not. A blog can be huge because it posts 60 articles a month even though it has only been running for a year. This blog can be a lot bigger than the blog of someone who posts less often but have been blogging on the same subject for many years.

Is this phenomenon spreading to other parts of the society or not?

If a person who graduated from school three years ago apply for a job and is measured against an experienced highly appreciated professional in the area, the experienced person usually win, even though the fairly recent graduate have performed great during the last few years.

In some fields, however;

Like in the IT business, it might be better to have accomplished great things in the last few years than to be very experienced, because the technology changes so fast. So there, the fairly new graduate might win the battle against the experienced professional.

What do you think? Are we valuing quantitive quality over experience?

Picture credit: Websuccessdiva